Here ya go, girls...!

Dannorama · Post by **Dannorama** » Mon Jun 01, 2009 11:39 am

A new 1680 wallpaper:

http://img192.imageshack.us/img192/5985/1111680.jpg

daytripper · Post by **daytripper** » Mon Jun 01, 2009 12:02 pm

Uh.....Thanks Dano.
A little more revieling than I remembered.

sparkinthedark · Post by **sparkinthedark** » Mon Jun 01, 2009 4:23 pm

Ooh, 'ello...

glamprincess · Post by **glamprincess** » Mon Jun 01, 2009 6:14 pm

The funny thing about this picture is where it made an appearance. It wouldn't have been too surprising if it had been featured in Rolling Stone, especially since Rolling Stone Magazine was where David Cassidy shed his "wholesome" image as well as all of his clothes in 1972. Or Cosmopolitan magazine would have made some sense too. But no.....this pic was merrily featured in, of all things, 16 Magazine! Yes, THE 16 Magazine which catered to prepubescent girls between the ages of 8-12. Must have made quite the impression.....

Dannorama · Post by **Dannorama** » Tue Jun 02, 2009 1:44 am

Glam, you are right as usual. 16 Magazine was the symbol of teenybopper heaven in the 70's.

Baz, I promise - I'll return this issue to you next week. Please stop badgering me...

glamprincess · Post by **glamprincess** » Tue Jun 02, 2009 1:13 pm

Dannorama wrote:Glam, you are right as usual. 16 Magazine was the symbol of teenybopper heaven in the 70's.

Baz, I promise - I'll return this issue to you next week. Please stop badgering me...

Yes, the good ol' days of teenybopper magazines like 16 and Tigerbeat!

Danno, considering the "behaviour" of Baz...and a few others, I think you should have called this thread "Here ya go, girls....and a few guys ...".

daytripper · Post by **daytripper** » Tue Jun 02, 2009 4:21 pm

You know them too well Glam !

Speaking of pictures...here are 2 sideshows of very good pictures of Alice. Some are posters and some are snapshots and so on. I want to thak all the contributors of the pictures..That includes Spark In The Dark and PickUpTheBones and some others. I hope you enjoy them. I do.

http://s294.photobucket.com/albums/mm88 ... 2f5eee.pbw
http://s294.photobucket.com/albums/mm88 ... 01ed21.pbw

Gunner · Post by **Gunner** » Tue Jun 02, 2009 9:29 pm

The funny thing about this picture is where it made an appearance. It wouldn't have been too surprising if it had been featured in Rolling Stone, especially since Rolling Stone Magazine was where David Cassidy shed his "wholesome" image as well as all of his clothes in 1972. Or Cosmopolitan magazine would have made some sense too. But no.....this pic was merrily featured in, of all things, 16 Magazine! Yes, THE 16 Magazine which catered to prepubescent girls between the ages of 8-12. Must have made quite the impression.....

I imagine that the bottom of the pic was cropped for this teen mag...no??

glamprincess · Post by **glamprincess** » Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:22 pm

Gunner wrote:
The funny thing about this picture is where it made an appearance. It wouldn't have been too surprising if it had been featured in Rolling Stone, especially since Rolling Stone Magazine was where David Cassidy shed his "wholesome" image as well as all of his clothes in 1972. Or Cosmopolitan magazine would have made some sense too. But no.....this pic was merrily featured in, of all things, 16 Magazine! Yes, THE 16 Magazine which catered to prepubescent girls between the ages of 8-12. Must have made quite the impression.....
I imagine that the bottom of the pic was cropped for this teen mag...no??

No, that's the full picture. I don't think there are any published photos showing the "full monty" of Alice.......(sorry girls!)

NotSoPerfect · Post by **NotSoPerfect** » Wed Jun 03, 2009 5:57 am

I *think* he meant the hair that's showing on the bottom.

I tell ya, I'm 27 and used to get 16 Magazine when I was the right age.....and even NOW you don't see that kind of picture in there. Amazing they put it in back then!

glamprincess · Post by **glamprincess** » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:24 pm

NotSoPerfect wrote:I *think* he meant the hair that's showing on the bottom.

I tell ya, I'm 27 and used to get 16 Magazine when I was the right age.....and even NOW you don't see that kind of picture in there. Amazing they put it in back then!

But my original post made it clear that this entire picture (or a similar one), including the hair, was included in 16 Magazine. So I thought his post meant that he thought it was cropped so that teens wouldn't see anything more.

Your second comment is very interesting and true. I really think in many ways, people are more conservative nowadays than they were back then. The 60s and 70s had a rebelliousness and wildness about them.

Jumping Jack · Post by **Jumping Jack** » Wed Jun 03, 2009 3:59 pm

That's a dandy scar.

18ForBritainOnly · Post by **18ForBritainOnly** » Fri Jun 05, 2009 5:03 am

Very Exhilarating! Just the right type of eye candy. A girl can get lost in those...

Baz · Post by **Baz** » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:25 pm

Dannorama wrote:Glam, you are right as usual. 16 Magazine was the symbol of teenybopper heaven in the 70's.

Baz, I promise - I'll return this issue to you next week. Please stop badgering me...

Next week ?
You told me you had already posted it back.
It had better be in the same condition when it arrives.

I also said this photo was not for sharing.

daytripper · Post by **daytripper** » Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:22 pm

Baz....you are too much.

18ForBritainOnly · Post by **18ForBritainOnly** » Sun Jun 07, 2009 7:49 am

Alice gave us just enough to run with it. Our imagination is ANYTHING we want past those

Damn it, ya'll are going to make me loose my precious "Trash" status with this picture. It's funny that the next album I purchased was "The Last Temptation" (thanks again for the suggestion SparkintheDark).

Mad Axeman · Post by **Mad Axeman** » Mon Jun 08, 2009 9:14 am

Hmm.. You'd think he'd have a bit of a trim before a fotoshoot!
The name 'Wahl' ring any bells Alice?

glamprincess · Post by **glamprincess** » Mon Jun 08, 2009 12:10 pm

Mad Axeman wrote:Hmm.. You'd think he'd have a bit of a trim before a fotoshoot!

People didn't "trim" as much back in the 70s. The "natural" look was more in back then.

Gunner · Post by **Gunner** » Mon Jun 08, 2009 12:54 pm

I *think* he meant the hair that's showing on the bottom.

I DID mean that actually. I am suprised that that photo went out like that at the time in that magazine!

I do remember buying 'Words' (well, one of those pop lyrics books you could buy in the early 70s) because it proudly proclaimed 'pull out Alice Cooper pic' only to discover when I bought it that it was a picture of alice wearing nothing but a snake!! It was that one used on the giant billboard that was stalled in Piccadilly Circus. I hadn't seen it before, my brother snatched it off me and showed it to my parents.....I felt stupid and a bit of a weirdo, was only 8!!!!

glamprincess · Post by **glamprincess** » Mon Jun 08, 2009 1:07 pm

Gunner wrote:
I *think* he meant the hair that's showing on the bottom.
I DID mean that actually. I am suprised that that photo went out like that at the time in that magazine!

But if you look at my original post, I was saying that it would have been less surprising had this photo appeared in some other magazine like Rolling Stone (where even David Cassidy went totally nude)...and how the real shock was that it appeared in 16 Magazine, of all places! That was the whole point of my original post.

Here ya go, girls...!

Here ya go, girls...!

Re: Here ya go, girls...!

Re: Here ya go, girls...!

Re: Here ya go, girls...!

Re: Here ya go, girls...!

Re: Here ya go, girls...!

Re: Here ya go, girls...!

Re: Here ya go, girls...!

Re: Here ya go, girls...!

Re: Here ya go, girls...!

Re: Here ya go, girls...!

Re: Here ya go, girls...!

Re: Here ya go, girls...!

Re: Here ya go, girls...!

Re: Here ya go, girls...!

Re: Here ya go, girls...!

Re: Here ya go, girls...!

Re: Here ya go, girls...!

Re: Here ya go, girls...!

Re: Here ya go, girls...!