cooperrocks wrote:I am with those who aren't in favor of a reunion with the original band. I love all eras of Alice. In fact my favorite era(s) of Alice are probably 1986-2000 but I love the others as well. This has always been the thing with me (and I am fully prepared to be criticized for my opinion) but I don't have a desire to see an original band reunion. Yes, working on a few songs together is fine, but I think the old expression "You can't go home again" is often true.
One, while there is no question much of the original band's work was great not everything they did was. There were plenty of mistakes too so the assumption that a 2017 original band album would be a masterpiece is wishful thinking but no evidence that is true. Second, and I know this bothers people but the average rock fan (outside of those of us who are diehards) have always thought of Alice as a solo artist so if there were an original band reunion for a full scaled album, it wouldn't help sales for the most part. Third, Alice remained in music even after the split while the others have not been consistent (a little more in recent years). Alice has always desired to stay modern and be competitive as much as he can with the current music scene. Is the original band equipped to write that way? Maybe so, maybe no. Next, as far as touring goes Alice's current band the last few years musically are the best band he has ever had in my opinion from top to bottom. They bring energy and everyone is top notch. Nothing against the original band but no one in the band is young anymore. Are they capable of doing a six month run without wearing down outside of Alice who tours extensively every year? I think most people when they go to see Alice these days leave with a positive impression. He still looks, sounds, and moves like Alice and his backing band are great. Would you be getting the same atmosphere if everyone in the band was around 70 years old?
Lastly, it has been many, many years since the original band consistently played together. Since most people think Alice was always a solo act, they would play in the same type of venues, etc so financially it doesn't make a ton of sense and there really is little value in doing it as in some ways it could hurt the legacy. People remember the energy of the original band and how unpredictable they were. That was the draw. It wouldn't be like that anymore. How tight would they be musically? It would be a case, I suspect where fans would go in with the desire for it to be 1972 all over again and outside of the nostalgia of seeing the original guys, it wouldn't be anymore than that.
I hope the new album actually is more guitar driven and is a little bit heavier.
A few points:
Nothing would help recording sales at this point not even Johnny Depp, Keisha and the chubby Country guitar player.
If the public only knows Alice then it would make no difference who the line up is. It wouldn't effect ticket sales.
No mis-steps for 4 Classic albums and I don't use the word classsic lightly. Not even a bad song ntil we get to MOL which has a few sub par ones.
Alice himself has no problem thinking it's 72 again. The majority of the set is from the early 70's.
There are many bands in their late sixties rocking out today.
If you can't go home what was WTMN2? Why is Ezrin back?
Apart from Michaels health and recent hand injury there is no evidence that they could not do a six month tour if they wanted to. The Stooges held up quite well live despite two of them being in hibernation in moms basement for 30 years.
Alice, as he always has, holds all the cards. My guess is he doesn't want DD MB and NS around for a lengthy tour ( or maybe even a short one ). He is happy with these brief flirtations and will leave it at that. He took the company name and ran with it. These guys at the end of the day just want to play. I hope he is Christian enough to let them get back on board for a last hurrah.