... and indeed i'd already answered my own question, was just tallking/typing to myself, i guess!A_MichaelUK wrote:
The internet has to be full of that information and should be easy to find.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio_mastering#Process
Moderators: Devon, Gorehound, Si, SickThings, Shoesalesman
... and indeed i'd already answered my own question, was just tallking/typing to myself, i guess!A_MichaelUK wrote:
The internet has to be full of that information and should be easy to find.
This has been said before, but I will reiterate. Hoffman sytle masterings aren't going to impress if you are playing them on cheap equipment (pc speakers, crappy earbuds, $300 dollar Sound Design stereo systems).Toronto Bob wrote:That Steve H. has a thin skin. It's just as well I don't belong to that forum. I seem to be the only one who was not delighted with the 3 AC albums he did. I'm not saying they are terrible or worse than the original WB cd - just not really improved and with some small anomolies that no one else seemed to notice.
I still will likely purchase this re-issue of BDB in hopes there's something worthwhile to hear.
Oh OK - I had forgotten that I made a detailed list of my audio systam and that you had deemed it "cheap, crappy". Oh wait that never happened.RemarkablyInsincere wrote:This has been said before, but I will reiterate. Hoffman sytle masterings aren't going to impress if you are playing them on cheap equipment (pc speakers, crappy earbuds, $300 dollar Sound Design stereo systems).Toronto Bob wrote:That Steve H. has a thin skin. It's just as well I don't belong to that forum. I seem to be the only one who was not delighted with the 3 AC albums he did. I'm not saying they are terrible or worse than the original WB cd - just not really improved and with some small anomolies that no one else seemed to notice.
I still will likely purchase this re-issue of BDB in hopes there's something worthwhile to hear.
If you have cheap, crappy equipment, often the brickwalled, compressed ear bleeders will sound better on your system because they can compensate for deficiencies in cheap equipment. But overall the sound is still lousy.
The more revealing your equipment, the better quality mastered music will sound. You don't have to spend a ton either in this day and age, but you can't buy bargain basement stuff. Some mid level equipment can reap the benefits. Even an iPod can sound pretty good if you go and invest in a quality set of earphones.
That's just the way it is.
A joke I presume>>pitkin88 wrote:You have been banned for the following reason: Banned for causing Steve to nearly lose his Job.
mestreech wrote:A joke I presume>>pitkin88 wrote:You have been banned for the following reason: Banned for causing Steve to nearly lose his Job.
I wasn't referring to you specifically.Toronto Bob wrote:Oh OK - I had forgotten that I made a detailed list of my audio systam and that you had deemed it "cheap, crappy". Oh wait that never happened.
Hoffman doesn't do edits. He stays completely analog until the last possible moment so it's not doable. With Hoffman, you get what's on the tape so getting the highest quality tapes is of utmost importance.Toronto Bob wrote: I went to the computer ripped the files and checked out the spectral frequency and lo and behold my ears weren't hearing things - there was definitely a low level hum preceding every track not present on the WB disc. For the LITD re-master @ 5:00 into Black Juju a click can be heard on the SH version. To be sure that click is there on the original WB cd @ 4:59 but it would have been such an easy fix - so with that lack of attention to detail it makes me wonder.
RemarkablyInsincere wrote:I wasn't referring to you specifically.Toronto Bob wrote:Oh OK - I had forgotten that I made a detailed list of my audio systam and that you had deemed it "cheap, crappy". Oh wait that never happened.
Hoffman doesn't do edits. He stays completely analog until the last possible moment so it's not doable. With Hoffman, you get what's on the tape so getting the highest quality tapes is of utmost importance.Toronto Bob wrote: I went to the computer ripped the files and checked out the spectral frequency and lo and behold my ears weren't hearing things - there was definitely a low level hum preceding every track not present on the WB disc. For the LITD re-master @ 5:00 into Black Juju a click can be heard on the SH version. To be sure that click is there on the original WB cd @ 4:59 but it would have been such an easy fix - so with that lack of attention to detail it makes me wonder.
A_MichaelUK wrote:>" the suits " getting involved could you ask Ezrin if he agrees that Hoffman has the original master?
Maybe but I think you may be missing the point. Ezrin doesn't have the tapes in his possession, so he can only go by what Hoffman said, hence Ezrin's scepticism. It appears Hoffman has the correct box, but that doesn't mean he has the correct tape. Anything could be in there (and I know of at least one producer who discovered this when he was asked to remaster an album he had produced). So I don't think Ezrin can answer your question without him hearing or even maybe seeing the actual tape or tapes.
Completely different things and I'm pretty sure you already know this given the amount of time you've spent on the Hoffman boards.pitkin88 wrote: First, Stephen Marsh went in and fixed each and every edit (the glue on the splice tape had bled over the years and it was a sticky mess at each of the many edit points). No baking of the tape was required as the tape stock was from the good year of 1972. Tape still played fine, no shedding whatsoever. Good news.
Nope. Different source.pitkin88 wrote:I thought he fixed the drop out on Under My Wheels too.
Sure you weren't referring to me specifically, you just said people with cheap audio systems weren't going to be able to appreciate the improvements. Entirely different.RemarkablyInsincere wrote:I wasn't referring to you specifically.Toronto Bob wrote:Oh OK - I had forgotten that I made a detailed list of my audio systam and that you had deemed it "cheap, crappy". Oh wait that never happened.
Hoffman doesn't do edits. He stays completely analog until the last possible moment so it's not doable. With Hoffman, you get what's on the tape so getting the highest quality tapes is of utmost importance.Toronto Bob wrote: I went to the computer ripped the files and checked out the spectral frequency and lo and behold my ears weren't hearing things - there was definitely a low level hum preceding every track not present on the WB disc. For the LITD re-master @ 5:00 into Black Juju a click can be heard on the SH version. To be sure that click is there on the original WB cd @ 4:59 but it would have been such an easy fix - so with that lack of attention to detail it makes me wonder.
How could I be referring to you if you don't meet those criteria?Toronto Bob wrote: Sure you weren't referring to me specifically, you just said people with cheap audio systems weren't going to be able to appreciate the improvements. Entirely different.
It makes little sense to scrap your entire process in order to fix a minor blemish on the tape.Toronto Bob wrote: Not doing a non-destructive edit is a poor decision anyway you slice it.
And you would be wrong on that point as well.RemarkablyInsincere wrote:How could I be referring to you if you don't meet those criteria?Toronto Bob wrote: Sure you weren't referring to me specifically, you just said people with cheap audio systems weren't going to be able to appreciate the improvements. Entirely different.
If I'd intended to refer to you specifically, I'd have said people who are never happy with anything will not appreciate the sound quality of these remasters.
.