Time for a change in management ?
Moderators: Devon, Gorehound, Si, SickThings, Shoesalesman
Time for a change in management ?
Don`t get me wrong, i`m a huge Alice fan,always will be,but i do wonder some times about the way things are done.The last few albums have all been under sold,which you could say are down to many factors ( Promotion from the record labels etc ,also it has to be said the tour setlists which have now become very stale and which rely to much on the same old back catalogue tracks don`t help,if the new material is always going to be overlooked by the old stuff,why bother making new albums.With the release of ACAS and the so far good promotion it has been given on-line,regardless of the release date, the European tour should of started with at least 6 new tracks from it,most fans attending the shows will of already heard the tracks anyway,it now seems that the first time anybody in Europe is likely to hear anything new will be in Germany in November & December ( Support dates with Whitesnake or 2009).It just seems such a waste to me.It`s a tough enough market as it is,this day and age is all about today and not tomorrow.The Brutal Planet tour setlst was the last time a new album had the most new tracks included since the Trash tour.Since then each tour Dragontown,Eyes and Dirty Diamonds have all featured less in the setlists despite the increasing tour schedule. YOU TOUR,YOU PLAY,YOU SELL
- Shoesalesman
- Little Mermaid
- Posts: 15234
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 4:39 pm
- Location: Edmonton, Alberta
- Contact:
Re: Time for a change in management ?
I've wondered how long Alice has been thinking of the Along Came A Spider idea before plans were made to conceptualize it. If he had the idea a few years ago, in some early form, maybe the last few years of recording and touring was a chance to go in a different direction musically (which wasn't since he returned to a sound he was part of in the early '70s) while ACAS went from idea to paper. I'm surely not saying the last two albums were back-burners (because they're not) or that ACAS was years in the making, but he chose to do two rockin' albums from the garage focused more on songs than concept.Rob wrote:Since then each tour Dragontown,Eyes and Dirty Diamonds have all featured less in the setlists despite the increasing tour schedule.
I saw both Eyes and DD tours, and although they were scaled down and loaded with old hits, the energy was there. To me anyway, there seemed to be a recharge in the last five years on the road for Alice, playing lots of dates like you mentioned.
If I may put forward a slice of personal colostomy...
- Shoesalesman
- Little Mermaid
- Posts: 15234
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 4:39 pm
- Location: Edmonton, Alberta
- Contact:
- steven_crayn
- Dada God
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 3:56 pm
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
Toby Mamis is Alice's manager but he works for Shep Gordon who runs Alive Enterprises which handles Alice amongst other things such as film production.
Both do a great job, If it ain't broke don't fix it.
Both do a great job, If it ain't broke don't fix it.
Lead guitar on Social Debris. Album on iTunes, Amazon & Spotify, title track featured on TV
- RemarkablyInsincere
- Dada God
- Posts: 2800
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 5:47 pm
- Location: Pittsburgh, PA
The entire record industry is in a free fall... I don't think severing a 40 year old business relationship in the slim hopes that there suddenly would be a huge career resurgence would be wise.
In all honesty, Alice is doing pretty well in the scheme of things when compared to many of his contemporaries.
In all honesty, Alice is doing pretty well in the scheme of things when compared to many of his contemporaries.
"Golly gee it's wrong to be so guilty..."
-
- Dada God
- Posts: 757
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 1:24 am
- Location: Canada
Well said, RemarkablyInsincere. You write some really good posts. Alice and Shep seem to have a great friendship. They made eachother successful. Why would they ruin a 40 year-old relationship now?RemarkablyInsincere wrote:The entire record industry is in a free fall... I don't think severing a 40 year old business relationship in the slim hopes that there suddenly would be a huge career resurgence would be wise.
In all honesty, Alice is doing pretty well in the scheme of things when compared to many of his contemporaries.
-
- Dada God
- Posts: 5383
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 12:35 pm
Man, you're either really loyal or really boredA_MichaelUK wrote:>Alice really isnt interested in releasing groundbreaking stuff now for several reasons
Tell us what they are.
In answer to your question I feel that Alice would have to be controversial again in order to be groundbreaking and he is beyond that now. He's not going to reinvent himself again at 60 nor should he have to. Plus his new found faith would restrict extreme envelope pushing. Like I said in the other thread about Shep he has already done enough groundbreaking work for two lifetimes.
-
- Dada God
- Posts: 5383
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 12:35 pm
> you're either really loyal or really bored
I prefer to think of it as a quest for clarification.
>In answer to your question I feel that Alice would have to be controversial again in order to be groundbreaking and he is beyond that now. He's not going to reinvent himself again at 60 nor should he have to.
That's a good explanation (which basically I agree with) and the clarification I was after. It's just that you had made it sound like he was against the idea or something.
> Plus his new found faith would restrict extreme envelope pushing.
I think you were nearer the mark with your statements which I quote above.
>Like I said in the other thread about Shep
You mean this thread, I think.
>he has already done enough groundbreaking work for two lifetimes.
I totally agree, although I think the original post in this thread from Rob wasn't about being "groundbreaking", but about record sales. That's also why I wasn't clear about what you meant.
Talking of "the other thread", did you find that credit for "I Miss You" that we discussed?
I prefer to think of it as a quest for clarification.
>In answer to your question I feel that Alice would have to be controversial again in order to be groundbreaking and he is beyond that now. He's not going to reinvent himself again at 60 nor should he have to.
That's a good explanation (which basically I agree with) and the clarification I was after. It's just that you had made it sound like he was against the idea or something.
> Plus his new found faith would restrict extreme envelope pushing.
I think you were nearer the mark with your statements which I quote above.
>Like I said in the other thread about Shep
You mean this thread, I think.
>he has already done enough groundbreaking work for two lifetimes.
I totally agree, although I think the original post in this thread from Rob wasn't about being "groundbreaking", but about record sales. That's also why I wasn't clear about what you meant.
Talking of "the other thread", did you find that credit for "I Miss You" that we discussed?
- Shoesalesman
- Little Mermaid
- Posts: 15234
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 4:39 pm
- Location: Edmonton, Alberta
- Contact:
- RemarkablyInsincere
- Dada God
- Posts: 2800
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 5:47 pm
- Location: Pittsburgh, PA
I actually forgot all about that as a weekend and a thousand beers have passed through my system since we last spoke about this. I will find it though an initial Internet search has yielded nothing definitive. I'm SURE I read this somewhere but cant remember where. I thought it was credited on the back of the album. I'll have to pull mine out and get back to you. I also can contact someone who without question will know...A_MichaelUK wrote: Talking of "the other thread", did you find that credit for "I Miss You" that we discussed?
stay tuned
To this day I believe that Alice should have stayed with a major label after Epic records. He could have easily gone to Columbia, Elektra, Hollywood, or possibly back to MCA or Warner..if they're even around. There HAD to have been some interest in Alice by some of the big companies.
Or maybe just do his business thru an international label like EMI or Virgin records?
I've never trusted indie labels, they get shut down too quickly because they don't have the support or financing to keep themselves afloat. Take a look at Wind Up and Sanctuary records; Wind Up had some of the greatest post grunge artists on the label and now they're barely hanging on to two really good bands and a boatload of newer bands that won't be around for long.
Spitfire? New West?? Please...
Sanctuary had the likes of Iron Maiden, Queensryche, Kiss, and they could have the potential to become a major label for veteran artists but they went belly up also.
It's the same thing for restruants in the first years alone, some make it and others don't.
To me, Alice should have stayed with a major label. I never bought that majors limit creative freedom. I think if he was handled correctly from 2000 onwards and if Alice released the same exact albums, then it would have been a different and possibly better story.
Or maybe just do his business thru an international label like EMI or Virgin records?
I've never trusted indie labels, they get shut down too quickly because they don't have the support or financing to keep themselves afloat. Take a look at Wind Up and Sanctuary records; Wind Up had some of the greatest post grunge artists on the label and now they're barely hanging on to two really good bands and a boatload of newer bands that won't be around for long.
Spitfire? New West?? Please...
Sanctuary had the likes of Iron Maiden, Queensryche, Kiss, and they could have the potential to become a major label for veteran artists but they went belly up also.
It's the same thing for restruants in the first years alone, some make it and others don't.
To me, Alice should have stayed with a major label. I never bought that majors limit creative freedom. I think if he was handled correctly from 2000 onwards and if Alice released the same exact albums, then it would have been a different and possibly better story.
-
- Goat Herder
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 11:59 am
- Location: Still Outside Your Bedroom Window
Actually, Alice DID go to Hollywood Records. See here: http://www.sickthingsuk.co.uk/misc/hollywood.phpMacQueen wrote:To this day I believe that Alice should have stayed with a major label after Epic records. He could have easily gone to Columbia, Elektra, Hollywood,
That isn't always true. Plenty of smaller indie labels around. Having said that, what you said could apply to major labels too, and it does.I've never trusted indie labels, they get shut down too quickly because they don't have the support or financing to keep themselves afloat.
Probably sounded like a good idea at first.Spitfire?
That's still a mystery.. but having said that, they had done more at this point before a new album release than what I can tell SPV has. Not to say SPV won't do anything, but still.New West?? Please...
While I agree with the idea of what you say, it may not have been Alice's choice to choose the labels he was on necessarily. He just can't walk in a record company's office door and say "Give me a contract" and bam. For all we know, there were offers from the majors but management didn't like the terms of the contract.To me, Alice should have stayed with a major label. I never bought that majors limit creative freedom. I think if he was handled correctly from 2000 onwards and if Alice released the same exact albums, then it would have been a different and possibly better story.
Another thing to consider in today's world, is with Indies at least you can write the music you want for the most part, if not complete. The major labels probably don't believe in such a thing as "artistic freedom." Hince, why the stuff that chart topping stuff that gets pushed is mostly corporate crap (and has been for years) while some of the acclaimed best material comes out on Indie or Independent releases.
And even something else to consider.. the last major label Alice was on (Epic), he started off very well, but the sales went down as each album went by (ironically as arguable the quality of the material went up.) A major record company might look at Alice's sales from 1989 on and may think he may be too much of a financial risk (remember, quantity over quality for corporate suits anymore).. where as those sales figures are probably gold to an Indie label so they will snap him right up.
Personally, I am of the opinion that Alice should release the albums himself, but that's another discussion.
Me = Winning
-
- Dada God
- Posts: 757
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 1:24 am
- Location: Canada
I don't think people should just presume that "he could easily have gone" to a big label or that "there HAD to have been some interest in Alice by some of the big companies". No offense, but how do you know? I just don't think people should assume that things are so simple and straightforward.MacQueen wrote:To this day I believe that Alice should have stayed with a major label after Epic records. He could have easily gone to Columbia, Elektra, Hollywood, or possibly back to MCA or Warner..if they're even around. There HAD to have been some interest in Alice by some of the big companies.
And as WYM pointed out, Alice did go to Hollywood Records but the person who Alice had a relationship with, Bob Pfeiffer, left Hollywood Records so then Alice didn't end up releasing material on that label.